Back to Squawk list
  • 16

Boeing set to lose biggest planemaker title as deliveries fall 37%

Übermittelt
 
Deliveries of the MAX aircraft were stopped in March after an Ethiopian Airlines crash killed all 157 people on board. Since then, Boeing has not reported any new order for the MAX planes. (uk.reuters.com) Mehr...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


clipper759
joe johnson 9
Flew with a Captain years ago at a once great carrier that is no more. She said it best "The most expensive thing this company does, is save money."
Jackx9
Don Quixote -3
The media just loves to cover Boeing and Airbus, and it's hilarious how anti and biased they are.
belzybob
belzybob 6
In the light of current events, bias is not an issue. Unless of course it is your own.
djames225
djames225 3
How is this article biased when it is just stating clear facts?
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 0
I was just reading your past comments, you really like to show everyone how smart you are by degrading everyone's comments, who did you say you fly for, do you really have your wings or are they feather wings of a black bird, hey belzybob ? I wonder of Flightaware tolerates racist comments here ?
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 0
stupid decisions lead to stupid results, their own fault for sourcing Chinese parts/components
djames225
djames225 1
WTHeck has Boeings fault got to do with China made parts? If you have a beef with China made parts, please take it to another forum.
belzybob
belzybob 1
Yes, Boeing's fault. Don't blame Chinese suppliers.
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 1
I absolutely do blame Chinese suppliers always have been supplying sub standard parts - I worked for PW&C for 15 years and we saw this all the time out of 100 parts shipped 90 were scrapped maybe today it is 50/50 but still quality does not play a major issue with China - the green back does
belzybob
belzybob 2
Presumably you are of Polish extraction, so you can be excused for your stupid comments. The fault is in the company that accepted the parts, not the supplier. if a company has crap QA, that is the problem.
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 0
do the planes you fly are old or do they have APUs ?
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 0
what does my ethnicity have to do with this. QA 1st off inspection were the ones that scrapped these parts - as some parts were to spec in configuration but to material specs, you are a pilot ( so called commercial) did you not read my comment or were you driven by the fact that I am of Politics origin. The QA problem starts with China doing final inspection before parts are shipped.
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 1
typo - Polish origin and not to material specs..
djames225
djames225 1
The companies in China do the inspections before parts are shipped, not China itself..eg Safran has an inhouse team which inspects it's shipments.. ALL it's shipments, from it's plants.
BobWysocki
Bob Wysocki-Borejsza 0
Even landing gear parts for the 787 Dreamliner, had to scrap lots of shipments and that is just in the last few years
djames225
djames225 1
Safran hasn't had to scarp lots of parts from it's own China factory..smh.
djames225
djames225 1

Anmelden

Haben Sie kein Konto? Jetzt (kostenlos) registrieren für kundenspezifische Funktionen, Flugbenachrichtigungen und vieles mehr!
Diese Website verwendet Cookies. Mit der Weiternutzung der Website drücken Sie Ihr Einverständnis mit dem Einsatz von Cookies aus.
Schließen
Wussten Sie schon, dass die Flugverfolgung auf FlightAware durch Werbung finanziert wird?
Sie können uns dabei helfen, FlightAware weiterhin kostenlos anzubieten, indem Sie Werbung auf FlightAware.com zulassen. Wir engagieren uns dafür, dass unsere Werbung auch in Zukunft zweckmäßig und unaufdringlich ist und Sie beim Surfen nicht stört. Das Erstellen einer Positivliste für Anzeigen auf FlightAware geht schnell und unkompliziert. Alternativ können Sie sich auch für eines unserer Premium-Benutzerkonten entscheiden..
Schließen