Ihr Browser wird ab dem 30.04.2020 nicht mehr unterstützt. aktualisieren Sie Ihren Browser |
Mitglied seit | |
Zuletzt online | |
Sprache | English (USA) |
Don't get me started on the KC-46. This should have been an easy conversion of the 767 airframes to meet the Air Forces needs but it seems Boeing has had a huge learning curve especially on things like the refueling boom. There were issuess with the wiring, avionics as well as tool being left in finished planes - go figure! I see similar problems across the board with the MAX, 787 in Charleston and the Kc-46 with the company doing way too much outsourcing and failing to QC all their processes as well as each finished aircraft. They want to push another unit out the door for the good old bottom line. Most of all the loss of engineering expertise in both Renton and Everett in favor of the $9.00/hr. software jockeys in India is simply being Penny-Wise and Pound Foolish. Boeing is going to have to work very hard to recover from these missteps.
(Written on 09.08.2019)(Permalink)
The rat (executive (s)) we are looking for is the guy or guys who decided to let the $9.00 engineers in India do the software. When you had great US talent in Renton and Everett they were sacrificed to save pennies. Surely the Boeing execs cannot be so blind as not to see that the cheap guys can cost you millions through reworks and delays (and billions maybe in lost sales). And now a lot of dead people whose relatives will want financial retribution. I'm just a passenger but certainly sorry to see these mistakes causing the loss of reputation of one of America's most iconic companies.
(Written on 15.07.2019)(Permalink)
The FAA is doing a CYA in light of their laissez faire approach on the 737 MAX. This 787 notice is nothing but a "housekeeping" exercise for the FAA as Boeing long ago make the fixes. The 737 problems are the ones needing resolution. Boeing's Mullenberger talks to stockholders and still seems to think the 30 minute iPad program is enough to get pilots up to speed on the MCAS. My belief is that Boeing at this point, should be bending over backwards to be absolutely sure pilots understand MCAS and that would mean mandated simulator time to test out the stall characteristics of the MCAS system. Costly? Yes, but it would show Boeing not as a penny pincher but as a responsible corporate citizen making sure that their MAX is fully understood by those who will fly it.
(Written on 03.05.2019)(Permalink)
I am not a member either but went to this link where you can set up a free membership in 2 minutes https://services10.ieee.org/as/authorization.oauth2?response_type=code&client_id=PF_AS_FOR_PA&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fspectrum.ieee.org%2Fpa%2Foidc%2Fcb&state=eyJ6aXAiOiJERUYiLCJzdWZmaXgiOiJ3R0FVU2IiLCJhbGciOiJkaXIiLCJlbmMiOiJBMTI4Q0JDLUhTMjU2Iiwia2lkIjoiM2EifQ..xTCcwSOuPDzO0Tj6aWLP6g.7vMdXZpqWnGpEyzVQm7sI-uJHFVH7v2ZVEHXECRWm7GiiPrfnWK9qzYpu9d8Pl0Gs3RA-3crBV-RLXH2iHCpZkawA69JwhSpgiZPJSan8-m8HD7EbG_qQFwWhwfwzmBI8tO8eTEkpN9t8K1EzZqCMY_yFFAh1rK34OXMBaNjufIvG04SsjH96yejselRmWPK.edcwvHOK96ag89K6Gm1vxQ&nonce=6CcJdXJJkEiDJZ1KgobwZWxdniN8aGSXUcj1NDtBdTY&acr_values=spe%20sts%20stm%20prf%20crt%20msp%20col%20otk%20cmp%20cmc&scope=openid%20profile%20address%20email%20phone&vnd_pi_requested_resource=https%3A%2F%2Fspectrum.ieee.org%2Fuser%2Flogin%3Fredirect_url%3D%2Faerospace%2Faviation%2Fhow-the-boeing-737-max-disaster-looks-to-a-software-developer&vnd_pi_application_name=SPECTRUM
(Written on 26.04.2019)(Permalink)
I'm not a pilot, just a lowly passenger suffering with normal seat pitch issues or clogged toilets. Those minor inconveniences still have always left me with the knowledge that I would arrive safely. No more! I read the article and it highlighted for me, how the culture of building a plane and then having it's safety elements verified by an independent party (the FAA) have been compromised. I believe Mr. Travis has shown how we have reached a serious cross roads where we need to look more closely at human/computer interaction - as a human pilot when do we take back control? Think Air France A-330 accident over the Atlantic a few years back. We also should expect more out of the airframe integrators. Boeing was lazy and wanted to push one more 737 variant out the door without having to design and build a totally new plane and the economics for doing that are highlighted in the article very well. At a minimum, Boeing should have boldly highlighted to the pilot community who would b
(Written on 26.04.2019)(Permalink)
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-02-14/airbus-terminates-a380-superjumbo-program-as-emirates-cuts-order It's done. Airbus' biggest mistake has been laid to rest. Last plane rolls off in 2021. Carriers are already ordering A-350's and 777-X.
(Written on 14.02.2019)(Permalink)
Maybe for United CEO to chat with Lion CEO? Still to get all the facts out on the Lion crash. Lawyers are circling. It will be a long investigation/litigation.
(Written on 21.12.2018)(Permalink)
I keep hoping one of these clowns who do these stunts will really suffer the consequences. A clear message - like a 10 year prison sentence might encourage miscreants to think twice about "droning" a major airport. What happened at Gatwick is just not acceptable. And the idea previously mentioned of tying a "device" (iPhone, etc.) to a drone is a marvelous idea.
(Written on 21.12.2018)(Permalink)
Just the facts please! Asian airlines need to get over trying to save face and run an airline properly; Boeing needs to stop posturing like a peacock in this case. We all look forward to a factual evaluation of what happened in this most unfortunate situation.
(Written on 21.12.2018)(Permalink)