Gesamt
← Back to Squawk list
787 Stuck at KSJC
This 787 has been sitting at San Jose Airport for 2 days due to a faulty generator. (flightaware.com) Mehr...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
Planes break. Shocker.
A new plane shouldn't break down this much. How many faulty generators have their been for the 787?
Good thing it's not an Airbus. All hell would've broken loose.
Good thing it's not an Airbus. All hell would've broken loose.
that's the age we live in now....build/make it cheaper and sale for more
[This poster has been suspended.]
You get what you pay for :)
I would like to inform you that Airbus is no more perfect than Boeing. I would like to point out that Boeing currently has a higher average service life for their aircraft than Airbus. What does that say about build quality?
It has nothing to do with quality, Airbus has never designed their planes to last longer than Boeing's. Their biggest point of sale is a way cheaper price than Boeing, but the down side of it is a shorter service life. And John was not wrong, if this was a Airbus aircraft the people on here would act like the freakin' sky was falling. For Boeing it's "teething issues", for Airbus it's the end of the world.
I never said Airbus is more perfect. I didn't even say Airbus is better than Boeing. All I stated was perfectly put by JetMech24, "For Boeing it's "teething issues", for Airbus it's the end of the world."
That's exactly why we're once again discussing another simple 787 mx issue, when an A380 that depressurized, dropped thousands of feet in altitude with oxygen masks dropped got much less than the deserved discussion.
Frequently, you get mx diversions that get played on the news sensationalizedly. You might get a backup AC pack get reported reported as 'pressurization issue' and 'emergency landing' when all that happened was a diversion for a simple mc issue.
In the recent SIA A380, they actually had a full-blown depressurization at cruise altitude despite ample reason for an mx diversion from the start of the flight and the previous one too.
Yet the serious A380 issue gets little press. And here we are all again either slamming or defending the 787. Really? Again?
And some want to pretend the reverse.
[BTW anyone know what happened with that SIA A380? Sucks when it's an Airbus that has an issue. They are so good at getrin people to shut up. Even worse when the diversion is to a far away corner of the world with little outside journalist coverage. Even worse when the history of location includes the Soviet bloc sphere of influence.
Frequently, you get mx diversions that get played on the news sensationalizedly. You might get a backup AC pack get reported reported as 'pressurization issue' and 'emergency landing' when all that happened was a diversion for a simple mc issue.
In the recent SIA A380, they actually had a full-blown depressurization at cruise altitude despite ample reason for an mx diversion from the start of the flight and the previous one too.
Yet the serious A380 issue gets little press. And here we are all again either slamming or defending the 787. Really? Again?
And some want to pretend the reverse.
[BTW anyone know what happened with that SIA A380? Sucks when it's an Airbus that has an issue. They are so good at getrin people to shut up. Even worse when the diversion is to a far away corner of the world with little outside journalist coverage. Even worse when the history of location includes the Soviet bloc sphere of influence.
They must work for Toyota!!